Less than a third of HR managers are unprejudiced when hiring

● Three-quarters have witnessed discrimination in the recruitment process

● A fifth admit they would avoid hiring a pregnant candidate

● One in 10 wouldn’t hire a woman for a male-dominated role

 

Less than a third of HR managers (32%) can confidently say they are unprejudiced during the recruitment process. Almost half (48%) admit bias impacts their candidate choice, while a further fifth (20%) said they couldn’t be sure.

 

 

This is according to research released by SomeoneWho, a new digital recruitment platform for interim managers, which launched in the UK last month.

 

A further three-quarters (74%) of HR managers have witnessed discrimination in the recruitment process – with a quarter (24.5%) calling it a regular practice.

 

The research also found that female candidates face a number of stigmas when looking for work. One in 10 recruiters said they would avoid a female applying for a male dominated role. A further one in 10 said they’d be reluctant to recruit a recently married candidate, as they were more likely to go on maternity leave soon. Shockingly, a fifth of HR managers said they would overlook a pregnant candidate.

 

One in 10 HR managers would be reluctant to hire someone with a thick accent. A further 10% said they’d be less likely to select candidates who attended a state school.

 

Commenting on the findings, Andrew Saffron, founder of SomeoneWho said:

 

“We all have personal preferences and bugbears – so it’s no surprise that bias creeps into the interview room to some extent. But our research shows that an alarming number of HR managers are actively ruling out candidates based on factors that are discriminatory – education, accent or gender – which is clearly unacceptable.

“One of the biggest reasons we launched the SomeoneWho digital recruitment platform was to create a level playing field. The industry is ready for a recruitment process that matches candidates to jobs based on their merit, rather than their background.”

 

On a more light-hearted note, there are plenty of classic job seeker foibles that are having a big impact on HR decision-making. Poor personal hygiene was a turn-off for two fifths of HR managers. Likewise casual dress codes (19%), big gaps in a CV (23%), and cocky candidates (36%) are all red lights.

 

The research was commissioned by SomeoneWho, a new digital platform that matches top quality interims with high quality briefs. Created by a team of interims for interims, SomeoneWho launched in the UK last month.

 

When screening a candidate, would any of the following traits put you off hiring them?

 

Poor personal hygiene – 39%

Cocky attitude – 36%

Has big gaps in their cv – 23%

Dressed too casually in the interview – 20%

Pregnant woman – 18%

Too young – 18%

Not very confident -17%

Extremely timid -17%

Old/nearing retirement -16%

Married female likely to go on maternity leave soon -11%

Hard to understand accent -11%

Female applying for a male-dominated role – 10%

Attended state school -10%

Male applying for a female-dominated role -9%

Attended private school – 8%

Holds a degree in a non-traditional subject – 8%

Overweight/obese -7%

Didn’t attend a ‘red brick’ university – 5%

Has a name that is hard to pronounce – 4%

Of ethnic origin – 4%

Underweight – 2%

Physically attractive – 1%

 

www.SomeoneWho.com

Author: Editor

Share This Post On